نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری رشته مدیریت فناوری اطلاعات، گروه مدیریت فناروی اطلاعات، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت فناروی اطلاعات، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

3 استاد گروه مدیریت فناروی اطلاعات، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار گروه مدیریت گردشگری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

باور حاکم بر ذینفعانی که ارائه دهنده خدمات گردشگری در مقصد هستند نقش مهمی در پایداری مقاصد دارد. مقادیر متغیرهای تاثیرگذار بر این باورها همیشه مبهم بوده و روابط علّی بین آنها نامطمئن است. اگر بخواهیم واقعیت پویایی موجود در عقاید آنها را نیز در نظر بگیریم، پیچیدگی موضوع افزایش خواهد یافت. برای این منظور از منطق فازی، شبکه‌های باور بیزی و مدل‌های پویایی عقیده استفاده کردیم. که بر روی داده‌های مربوط به ذینفعان ایرانی با هدف جذب گردشگران چینی پیاده‌سازی شده است. داده ها در طی سال های 2019، 2020 و 2021 توسط پرسشننامه جمع آوری شده و مربوط به 540 ذینفع است. درنهایت نه تنها یک شبیه سازی مبتنی بر عامل برای بصری‌سازی روندها و نحوه تکامل یا هم تکاملی آنها ارائه شده بلکه امکان پیش بینی روندهای معیوب و مطلوب به ترتیب برای جلوگیری یا تقویت آنها مهیا گردیده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Opinion Dynamics of Iranian Tourism Stakeholders in Their Encounter With Chinese Tourists

نویسندگان [English]

  • Reza Hosseingholizadeh 1
  • Mahmood Alborzi 2
  • Abbas Toloie Eshlaghy 3
  • Hamid Zargham Boroujeni 4

1 Ph.D. Candidate in Information Technology Management, Department of Information Technology Management, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Department of Information Technology Management, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Full Professor, Department of Information Technology Management, Science and Research branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Associate Professor, Department of Tourism Management, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The beliefs of the stakeholders who provide tourism services in destinations play an important role in the sustainability of destinations. The values ​​of variables affecting these beliefs are always ambiguous, and the causal relationships between them are uncertain. The reality of opinion dynamics reflects even more complexity. Therefore, the present study used fuzzy logic, Bayesian belief networks, and opinion dynamics models to investigate a complex topic. The models were applied to the data obtained from the Iranian stakeholders in a bid to attract Chinese tourists. The data was collected by administering the questionnaire to 540 stakeholders during 2019, 2020 and 2021. Finally, the research provided not only an agent-based simulation to visualize trends and their evolution or co-evolution, but also the possibility of predicting defective and desirable trends with the ultimate aim of preventing or reinforcing them.
Introduction
Despite the apparent regularity of the tourism process, ambiguity, uncertainty, and dynamism in the host community complicate the control of the process. It is ambiguous because different tastes are applied to it (Liu et al., 2021). It is uncertain because the stakeholders have different beliefs (Merigó et al., 2012). It is dynamic (Sainaghi & Baggio, 2017) because it is affected by environmental changes such as diseases (Soltan-Alinejad & Soltani, 2021), natural disasters (Rosselló et al., 2020), information technology (Xiang, 2018), and environmental issues (Saviolidis et al., 2021). Accordingly, conventional statistical tools are ineffective in capturing the whole complexity at work (Sun & Müller, 2013). In this respect, the current study used fuzzy logic, conditional probability, and diffusion processes on complex networks in order to model ambiguity, uncertainty, and dynamism, respectively. The fuzzy membership functions were used for the initial processing of the collected data (Serrano-Guerrero, 2021). The study utilized Bayesian belief networks to measure the community’s parameters in the current situation (Rohmer, 2020). Moreover, opinion dynamics was employed to predict future trends (Ureña et al., 2019). Specifically, the structural and parametric training of Bayesian belief networks was used to model the current beliefs of stakeholders in tourism destinations (Rohmer, 2020). The developed Bayesian belief network is able to make predictions, prescriptions, and causal inferences about the stakeholder-related variables of the community (Nadkarni & Shenoy, 2001). Therefore, various parameters of the community can be estimated by Bayesian belief networks (Gallardo, 2022). Stakeholders’ opinions are dynamic because they are influenced by contextual factors and other stakeholders (Steils et al., 2021). The study also intended to simulate the dynamics. There are many variables in stakeholders’ interactions that are influenced over time. Each stakeholder, also called the agent, has an opinion on each variable, so in interactions, stakeholders are influenced by their own opinions and those of others (Cape et al., 2018).
Materials and Methods
The current study aimed to create a structure for the beliefs of tourism stakeholders on the basis of tourists’ wishes and needs. Therefore, Bayesian belief networks, as a kind of causal network based on conditional probability theory, were used in this research. In the next step, the research employed opinion dynamics which is a subset of agent-based methods in the field of simulation. Agent-based methods, though recommended, are less addressed in the field of tourism. The data was collected by administering the questionnaire to 540 stakeholders in Iran during 2019, 2020, and 2021. The population of the stakeholders consisted of five classes including 265 hotels and accommodation centers, 170 tourism companies, 85 bus companies, 15 airlines, and 5 railway companies. The stratified sampling method was used to select the research participants.
Results and Discussion
By generating a joint probability distribution function for the variables governing the beliefs of the Iranian tourism stakeholders, the research integrated the beliefs into a coherent mathematical structure. In practice, this equation represented a kind of causal network structure that can answer different questions with the advantage that it can be retrained to be used to create a more updated distribution function when new data is entered. Relying on the agent-based method of opinion dynamics, the study simulated the future behavior of tourism stakeholders. The simulation showed what behaviors can be useful in attracting tourists, what behaviors are not in line with protecting the environment, and what behaviors can be suitable or unsuitable for attracting female tourists.
Conclusion
The research was designed to use the methods separately in order to avoid increasing the complexity of the research process due to the simultaneous use of diverse and powerful tools. Therefore, it is possible for researchers to use each of the methods independently. In addition, the obtained results are useful, diverse, and practical, and suggest the suitability and further use of agent-based methods (e.g., opinion dynamics) in the tourism research

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Management
  • Tourism
  • Bayesian belief networks
  • Opinion dynamics
  • Fuzzy
  1. امیر محمد کلابی (1401، بهار). ارائه مدل اکوسیستم گردشگری پایدار با رویکرد فراترکیب. مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری, 179- 206.
  2. حامد فلاح تفتی، مهناز دوستی ایرانی. (1401، تابستان). نگاشت شناختی فازی تأثیر تعاملات آنلاین بر سطوح وفاداری گردشگران (موردمطالعه: مشتریان آژانس‌های مسافرتی در شبکه اجتماعی اینستاگرام). مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 17، 133-161.
  3. ساناز شفیعی و علی رجب‌زاده قطری، علیرضا حسن‌زاده، سعید جهانیان. (1399، بهار). مقاصد گردشگری هوشمند: مرور سیستماتیک تحقیقات با استفاده از رویکرد قیف پارادایم. مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 15، 33-62.
  4. فاطمه یاوری گهر، فرشته منصوری مؤید. (1399، پاییز). واکاوی نقش تبلیغات بر نیات رفتاری مشتریان در دوران پساکرونا در صنعت گردشگری. مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 19، 33-58.
  5. Adrian Bejan, Umit Gunes.(2022). Virus spreading and heat spreading. International Journal of Thermal Sciences
  6. Altafini, C (2013). Consensus Problems on Networks with Antagonistic Interactions. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 935-946.(4)58
  7. Américo T. Bernardes, Leonardo Costa Ribeiro. (2021). Information, opinion and pandemic. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 565.
  8. Baggio, R. (2007). The web graph of a tourism system. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 734-727, (2)379
  9. Bob McKercher, Sebastian Filep, Brent Moyle(2021), Movement in tourism: Time to re-integrate the tourist? Annals of Tourism Research, 91.
  10. Brandon M. Turner, Trisha Van Zandt. (2018). Approximating Bayesian Inference through Model Simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 840-826, 9(22).
  11. Chao Liu, Allan M. Williams, Gang Li. (2022), Knowledge management practices of tourism consultants: A project ecology perspective. Tourism Management, 91
  12. Chen Gezhi, Huang Xiang. ,(2022), From good feelings to good behavior: Exploring the impacts of positive emotions on tourist environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management,9-1(50)
  13. Chien-Chiang Lee, Mei-Ping Chen. ,(2021), Ecological footprint, tourism development, and country risk: International evidence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279
  14. Dan Geiger, David Heckerman.,(1996), Knowledge representation and inference in similarity networks and Bayesian multinets. Artificial Intelligence, 45-74,(2-1),82
  15. Darwiche, A.(2008), Foundations of Artificial Intelligence) (V. L. Frank van Harmelen, Elsevier.
  16. Deffuant, G., Huet, S., Amblard, F (2005), . An individual-based model of innovation diffusion mixing social value and individual benefit. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1041-1069.
  17. DeGroot, M. H. (1974), Reaching a Consensus. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 118-121,(345)69
  18. Eitel J.M. Lauría, Peter J. Duchessi .(2006), A Bayesian Belief Network for IT implementation decision support. Decision Support Systems, 1573-1588, (3)42
  19. Fengwei Dai, Dan Wang, Ksenia Kirillova,(2022), Travel inspiration in tourist decision making. Tourism Management, 90
  20. Francesca Iandolo, Irene Fulco, Clara Bassano, Raffaele D’Amore. (2019). Managing a tourism destination as a viable complex system. The case of Arbatax Park. Land Use Policy, 84, 21-30.
  21. Frédéric Amblard, Guillaume Deffuant, (2004),The role of network topology on extremism propagation with the relative agreement opinion dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 725-738, 343
  22. Gallardo, M .(2022), Measuring vulnerability to multidimensional poverty with Bayesian network classifiers. Economic Analysis and Policy,492-512, 73
  23. Giacomo Del Chiappa, Rodolfo Baggio ,(2015), Knowledge transfer in smart tourism destinations: Analyzing the effects of a network structure. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management,145-150,(3)4
  24. Hamira Zamani-Farahani, Ghazali Musa ,(2012),The relationship between Islamic religiosity and residents’ perceptions of socio-cultural impacts of tourism in Iran: Case studies of Sare’in and Masooleh. Tourism Management,802-814, (4)33
  25. Hosseingholizadeh, R. (2010),Fuzzy Voting in Internal Elections of Educational and Party Organizations. International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering (WASET),4
  26. Huiying Zhang, Xi Yu Leung, Billy Bai, Yunpeng Li (2021),Uncovering crowdsourcing in tourism apps: A grounded theory study. Tourism Management, 87
  27. Ibrahim Elshaer, Mohamed Moustafa, Abu Elnasr Sobaih, Meqbel Aliedan, Alaa M.S. Azazz ,(2021), The impact of women's empowerment on sustainable tourism development: Mediating role of tourism involvement. Tourism Management Perspectives, 28
  28. Jaume Rosselló, Susanne Becken, Maria Santana-Gallego. (2020),The effects of natural disasters on international tourism: A global analysis. Tourism Management, 79
  29. Jesus Serrano-Guerrero, Francisco P. Romero, Jose A. Olivas,(2021), Fuzzy logic applied to opinion mining: A review. Knowledge-Based Systems, 222
  30. Jian Li, Tao Xiang, Linghui He.(2021), Modeling epidemic spread in transportation networks: A review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition),139-152, (2)8
  31. Jillian Student, Mark R. Kramer, Patrick Steinmann. (2020). Simulating emerging coastal tourism vulnerabilities: an agent-based modelling approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 85.
  32. José M. Merigó, Anna M. Gil-Lafuente, Onofre Martorell,(2012), Uncertain induced aggregation operators and its application in tourism management. Expert Systems with Applications,869-880, (1)39
  33. Kankana Chakrabarty, Ranjit Biswas, Sudarsan Nanda. (1999). A note on fuzzy union and fuzzy intersection. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,499-502, (3) 105
  34. Li Dai, Qi Han, Bauke de Vries, Yang Wang, (2021), Applying Bayesian Belief Network to explore key determinants for nature-based solutions’ acceptance of local stakeholders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 310
  35. Luis M. de Campos, Javier G. Castellano, (2007), Bayesian network learning algorithms using structural restrictions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,233-254, (2)45
  36. Lujun Su, Jin Cheng, Scott R. Swanson ,(2020), The impact of tourism activity type on emotion and storytelling: The moderating roles of travel companion presence and relative ability. Tourism Management,81
  37. Lydia Cape, Francois Retief, Paul Lochner, Thomas Fischer, Alan Bond, (2018), Exploring pluralism – Different stakeholder views of the expected and realised value of strategic environmental assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31-41, 69
  38. Madden, M. G,(2009), On the classification performance of TAN and general Bayesian networks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(7), 489-495.
  39. Marcelo Canteiro, Fernando Córdova-Tapia, Alejandro Brazeiro. (2018). Tourism impact assessment: A tool to evaluate the environmental impacts of touristic activities in Natural Protected Areas. Tourism Management Perspectives, 28, 220-227.
  40. Marco Scutari , Robert Ness. (2020, 09 16). Bayesian Network Structure Learning, Parameter Learning and, 4.6.1. (CRAN) 09 21, 2020، http://www.bnlearn.com/
  41. Marek J. Druzdzel, Herbert A. Simon. (1993). Causality in Bayesian Belief Networks. در M. David Heckerman, Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (3-11). Morgan Kaufmann.
  42. Marko Jusup, Petter Holme, Kiyoshi Kanazawa, Misako Takayasu, Ivan Romić, Zhen Wang, Sunčana Geček, Tomislav Lipić, Boris Podobnik, Lin Wang, Wei Luo, Tin Klanjšček, Jingfang Fan, Stefano Boccaletti, Matjaž Perc. (2022). Social physics. Physics Reports, 948, 1-148.
  43. Mohamed A. Abou-Shouk, Maryam Taha Mannaa, Ahmed Mohamed Elbaz. (2021). Women's empowerment and tourism development: A cross-country study. Tourism Management Perspectives, 37.
  44. Nadia Steils, Salwa Hanine, Hanane Rochdane, Siham Hamdani. (2021). Urban crowdsourcing: Stakeholder selection and dynamic knowledge flows in high and low complexity projects. Industrial Marketing Management, 94, 164-173.
  45. Nína M. Saviolidis, David Cook, Brynhildur Davíðsdóttir, Lára Jóhannsdóttir, Snjólfur Ólafsson. (2021). Challenges of national measurement of environmental sustainability in tourism. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 3.
  46. Noah E. Friedkin, Eugene C. Johnsen. (1997). Social positions in influence networks. Social Networks, 19(3), 209-222.
  47. A. Aguilera, A. Fernández, R. Fernández, R. Rumí, A. Salmerón. (2011). Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(12), 1376-1388.
  48. Parisa Soltan-Alinejad, Aboozar Soltani. (2021). Vector-borne diseases and tourism in Iran: Current issues and recommendations. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 43.
  49. Pearce, P. (2005). Tourist Behaviour: Themes and Conceptual schemes. Channel View.
  50. Pearce, P. L. (2005). Chapter 6 - The role of relationships in the tourist experience. در Butterworth-Heinemann, Global Tourism (Third Edition) (103-122)
  51. Pearl, J. (1982). Reverend Bayes on inference engines: A distributed hierarchical approach. In Proceedings AAAI National Conference on AI, (133-136). Pittsburgh,.
  52. Pearl, J. (1993). Belief networks revisited. Artificial Intelligence, 59(1–2), 49-56.
  53. Proskurnikov, A.; Matveev, A.; and Cao, M. (2016). Opinion dynamics in social networks with hostile camps: Consensus vs. polarization. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 61(6), 1524–1536.
  54. Jager, H.B. Verbruggen, P.M. Bruijn. (1992). The Role of Defuzzification Methods in the Application of Fuzzy Control. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 25(6), 75-80.
  55. Raquel Ureña, Gang Kou, Yucheng Dong, Francisco Chiclana, Enrique Herrera-Viedma. (2019). A review on trust propagation and opinion dynamics in social networks and group decision making frameworks. Information Sciences, 478, 461-475.
  56. Remi Harris, Elisa Furlan, Hung Vuong Pham, Silvia Torresan, Jaroslav Mysiak, Andrea Critto. (2022). A Bayesian network approach for multi-sectoral flood damage assessment and multi-scenario analysis. Climate Risk Management, 35.
  57. Rohmer, J. (2020). Uncertainties in conditional probability tables of discrete Bayesian Belief Networks: A comprehensive review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 88.
  58. Rongrong Kang, Xiang Li. (2022). Coevolution of opinion dynamics on evolving signed appraisal networks. Automatica, 137.
  59. Ruggero Sainaghi, Rodolfo Baggio. (2017). Complexity traits and dynamics of tourism destinations. Tourism Management, 63, 368-382.
  60. Sara Nichollas, Bas Amelung, Jillian Student. (2017). Agent-Based Modeling: A Powerful Tool for Tourism Researchers. Journal of Travel Research (JTR) 56(1).
  61. Sekulovic, N. (2015). Trends and New Initiatives in Tourism at the Time of the General Economic Crisis and the Current Situation in Serbian Tourism. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1628-1634.
  62. Sucheta Nadkarni, Prakash P Shenoy. (2001). A Bayesian network approach to making inferences in causal maps. European Journal of Operational Research, 128(3), 479-498.
  63. Tara Ma, Anita Heywood, C.Raina MacIntyre. (2021). Travel health seeking behaviours, masks, vaccines and outbreak awareness of Australian Chinese travellers visiting friends and relatives – Implications for control of COVID-19. Infection, Disease & Health, 26(1), 38-47.
  64. Thi Quynh Trang Nguyen, Patricia Johnson, Tamara Young. (2022). Networking, coopetition and sustainability of tourism destinations. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management.
  65. (2019). Guidelines for the Success in the Chinese Outbound Tourism Market. (UNWTO https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284421138
  66. Uusitalo, L. (2007). Advantages and challenges of Bayesian networks in environmental modelling. Ecological Modelling, 203(3–4), 312-318.
  67. Xiang, Z. (2018). From digitization to the age of acceleration: On information technology and tourism. Tourism Management Perspectives, 25, 147-150.
  68. Yeganeh Aghazamani, Deborah Kerstetter, Pete Allison. (2020). Women's perceptions of empowerment in Ramsar, a tourism destination in northern Iran. Women's Studies International Forum, 79.
  69. Yen-Liang Chen, Cheng-Hsiung Weng. (2009). Mining fuzzy association rules from questionnaire data. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(1), 46-56.
  70. Yixue Liu, Rouran Zhang, Yanbo Yao. (2021). How tourist power in social media affects tourism market regulation after unethical incidents: Evidence from China. Annals of Tourism Research, 91.
  71. Yucheng Dong, Min Zhan, Gang Kou, Zhaogang Ding, Haiming Liang. (2018). A survey on the fusion process in opinion dynamics. Information Fusion, 57-65, 43
  72. Yupeng Li, Meng Liu, Jin Cao, Xiaolin Wang, Na Zhang(2021), Multi-attribute group decision-making considering opinion dynamics. Expert Systems with Applications, 18.
  73. Zhanli Sun, Daniel Müller.(2013), A framework for modeling payments for ecosystem services with agent-based models, Bayesian belief networks and opinion dynamics models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 15-28, 45
  74. Zhi-jiao Du, Su-min Yu, Han-yang Luo, Xu-dong Lin. ,(2021)Consensus convergence in large-group social network environment: Coordination between trust relationship and opinion similarity. Knowledge-Based Systems, 217