Tourism Management Studies

Current Issue

By Issue

By Author

By Subject

Author Index

Keyword Index

About Journal

Aims and Scope

Publication Ethics

Memorandum of Understanding

Indexing and Abstracting

Related Links

FAQ

Peer Review Process

Journal Metrics

News

Article Writing Guide

Fails

Consultants

Consultants

Consultants

Consultants

Consultants

Consultants

Publons

This letter of scientific publications

Methodology for evaluation of scientific publications

آیین نامه اجرایی قانون پیگیری و مقابله با تقلب در تهیه آثار علمی

Geotourism protection strategies and geological heritage (Case Study: Lorestan Province)

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Assistant Professor of Geography, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate geo-tourism and geological protection strategies. The present research is applied in terms of purpose, and its method is combined (qualitative and quantitatively). The data collection and information collection tool and structured interview are structured. The statistical population of various experts has been in the relevant field of study in Lorestan Province. Seventy experts were selected by using a targeted sampling method. The unlimited exploration (Johannon method) test was used to identify and connect the strategies to geo-tourism elements of quality performance (QFD). The results of the study led to the identification of 36 strategies. So, 1) the most relevant strategies are those for protecting mountain landscapes, preserving national geo-parks and reserves, managing geographical heritage and documenting landscapes, introducing the economic values of geographical landscapes, and preventing pollution of the environmental and natural resources with the element of geographical perspective/geo-tourism. 2) Preserving land and preventing misuse of land, revitalizing geo-sites and damaged geological processes, ensuring the resiliency of tourist sites against natural disasters, introducing geological attractions and phenomena, and introducing geo-tourism areas with the highest geological background that have a relationship with geological processes. 3) Investment Strategies for the Construction of Infrastructure Facilities in the Geo-Citizens, drawing access routes to tourism attractions, using local customs and lifestyle in connection with the preservation of natural resources, and increasing public awareness to preserve the environment more closely related to tourism heritage have had the results of the oriented for the development of geo-tourism in Lorestan led to the identification of three types of short-term, medium and long-term orientation. Finally, recommendations and suggestions were made to achieve the goals of geo-tourism.
Introduction
The development of geo-tourism has many functions for local communities and is one of the appropriate solutions to deal with the problems of livelihood and unemployment. From the geocultural point of view, geo-tourism is considered a new way to develop less developed societies due to its economic efficiency. Although geo-tourism development has many benefits, the competitiveness of geo-tourism destinations and solving geo-tourism challenges and risks depends on several factors, including resources, demand conditions, management, marketing, and formulation of strategies for the destination. Developing a geo-tourism development strategy enables tourists to discover geo-sites, landscapes, and cultures and enjoy unique experiences of knowledge and sustainable development. In addition, formulating appropriate strategies can help improve the quality of life in the local community and turn destinations and areas with tourist attractions into a sustainable society. Also, developing geo-tourism strategies is a fundamental step in protecting the land and creating priorities in the management of tourist sites. Understanding and protecting landscapes, geology and geomorphology, geographic heritage, and experience of different features of geo-tourism are also promoted by formulating appropriate strategies. Therefore, it is necessary and necessary to identify the paths, strategies, and strategies of geo-tourism development to solve the challenges and sustainability of this type of tourism activities and future-oriented planning for its development.
​
Research Methodology
The purpose of this research is practical, and its method is combined (quantitative and qualitative). Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used to collect information and data. Theoretical studies and the theoretical basis of the research were collected using the document-library method. This research collected information and data related to strategies for developing geo-tourism and geographical heritage in Lorestan Province through a Likert Scale questionnaire. The statistical community includes experts in various fields such as geography, tourism management, economics, social sciences, and sociology, as well as tourism specialists and elites/tour managers in Lorestan Province. Seventy samples were selected to complete the questionnaire and conduct interviews using purposeful sampling.
Statistical methods (descriptive and inferential) were used to answer the research questions and analyze the data. In order to identify strategies and strategies for the development of geo-tourism in Lorestan Province, strategies and strategies for the protection of geo-tourism and geographical heritage were first identified through interviews and content analysis, and to determine the importance and prioritization of these strategies, an unlimited clustering rank test was used. Heuristic (Johansen method) was used. Then, the quality function mevelopment model (QFD) was used to investigate the importance and relationship of each geo-tourism development strategy and strategies with the critical elements of geo-tourism (geographic landscape, geological processes, tourism cultural heritage).
 
​ Findings
The exploratory unlimited co-accumulation rank test (Johansen's method) was used to investigate and analyze geo-tourism development strategies in Lorestan Province. In this test, according to special values (numerical value), while identifying and discovering the most important strategies, they can be ranked. For this, 33 strategies/strategies were considered and analyzed.
Examining the Johanson test, according to the rejection of the null hypothesis at the 0.001 level, the test’s significance is considered among the 36 strategies for analyzing development strategies and strategies of geo-tourism and geographical heritage. It showed that, in order and according to the unique values, ten strategies and strategies for the protection of landscapes and mountain landscapes, waterfalls, springs, forests, pastures, and all-natural landscapes with a unique value (0.131), preserving land resources, and preventing the abuse of land resources related to tourism with a unique value (0.126), capital and investment attraction in the cultural sector and the education of native people and the promotion of tourism infrastructure with a unique value (0.123), determining the paths of development and preservation of geo-parks, national parks or reserves with a unique value (0.117), Construction of infrastructure facilities in the geo-site environment (road, residence, internet) with a unique value (0.113), restoration of the geo-site, and damaged geological processes with a special value (0.111) have been the most critical development strategies of geo-tourism and geographical heritage.
Examining the Johanson test according to the rejection of the null hypothesis at the 0.005 level, the significance of the test showed that out of 36 strategies, ten strategies for preparing and increasing the resilience of tourism sites against natural and earth-building disasters (erosion, drift, creep) with a unique value (0.087) Increasing public awareness to participate in the environmental protection and tourism program with a unique value (0.084), environmental education of managers and local people and tourists themselves (0.079), recognizing and introducing the attractions and geological phenomena of the region to Tourists with a unique value (0.078), the most important critical and development strategies are geo-tourism and geographical heritage.
 
​ Discussion and results
Lorestan Province in the west of the country is known as the geo-tourism capital due to its prominent cultural and local values, pristine and natural landscapes in the high Zagros, various waterfalls (it is nicknamed the land of waterfalls), and mountainous and important geological features. However, in recent years, tourism in this province has been declining after the spread of the coronavirus pandemic.
The research results showed that in addition to the strategies and strategies for developing geo-tourism in Lorestan Province, the direction of future development and the prospect of geo-tourism development in Lorestan Province also needed to be developed. Based on the results, orientations have been presented in three short-term and present, medium-term, and long-term periods. So, the short-term orientation is more related to the development of geo-tourism products, the introduction of tourist attractions, and the protection of ecosystems, while the mid-term orientation is more related to investment in construction facilities and the development of geo-tourism facilities and infrastructures. And the expansion and cross-border development of geo-tourism in Lorestan Province. According to the findings, the general results of the research indicate that for the development of geo-tourism in Lorestan Province, development strategies should be used to diversify tourism types, develop unique geo-tourism products, and use geo-tourism tour programs. Be focused on these leaders. Also, the provided orientations can be used to complete the infrastructure, accommodation, and services in the tourist destination, education, and improvement and development of geo-tourism based on plans related to strategies and orientations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References
  1. Amaro, S., Chaves, N. B., Henriques, C., & Barroco, C. (2023). Motivation-Based Segmentation of Visitors to a UNESCO Global Geopark. Geoheritage, 15(2), 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00848-3
  2. Banik, S., & Mukhopadhyay, M. (2020). Model-based strategic planning for the development of community-based tourism: a case study of Ayodhya Hills in West Bengal, India. GeoJournal, pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10314-0
  3. Chylińska, D. (2019). The Role of the Picturesque in Geotourism and Iconic Geotourist Landscapes. Geoheritage, 11, 531-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-018-0308-x
  4. Datta, K. (2020). Application of SWOT-TOWS matrix and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the formulation of geoconservation and geotourism development strategies for mama bhagne pahar: An important geomorphosite in West Bengal, India. Geoheritage, 12(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00467-2
  5. Dowling, R. K. (2011). Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage, 3(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7
  6. Dowling, R. K. (2013). Global geotourism–an emerging form of sustainable tourism. Czech journal of tourism, 2(2), 59-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/cjot-2013-0004
  7. Dowling, R., & Newsome, D. (2018). Geotourism: Definition, characteristics, and international perspectives. Handbook of geotourism, 38(1),1-22. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785368868.00009
  8. Dowling, R.K. & Newsome, D. (2017). Geotourism Destinations—Visitor Impacts and Site Management Considerations. Czech Journal of Tourism, pp. 6, 111-129. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjot-2017-0006
  9. Dowling, R.K. (2011). Geotourism’s Global Growth. Geoheritage, p. 3, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7
  10. Ehsan, S., Leman, M.S. and Ara Begum, R. (2013). Geotourism: A Tool for Sustainable Development of Geoheritage Resources. Advanced Materials Research, 622-623, 1711-1715. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11010030
  11. Galvão, A., Mascarenhas, C., Marq, Ghosh, A., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2022). Evaluation of springs and waterfalls as Geomorphosites and proposition of strategies to develop Geotourism at Ajodhya hill, Puruliya district, Eastern India. GeoJournal, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10298-x
  12. Gordon, J. E. (2018). Geoheritage, geotourism and the cultural landscape: Enhancing the visitor experience and promoting geoconservation. Geosciences, 8(4), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040136
  13. Gordon, J. E. (2023). Climate Change and Geotourism: Impacts, Challenges, and Opportunities. Tourism and Hospitality, 4(4), 514-538.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/tourhosp4040032
  14. Halder, S., & Sarda, R. (2021). Promoting intangible cultural heritage (ICH) tourism: Strategy for socioeconomic development of snake charmers (India) through geoeducation, geotourism and geoconservation. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 9(2), 212-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.02.008
  15. Herrera-Franco, G., Carrión-Mero, P., Montalván-Burbano, N., Caicedo-Potosí, J., & Berrezueta, E. (2022). Geoheritage and geosites: A bibliometric analysis and literature review. Geosciences, 12(4), 169- 179. DOI:3390/geosciences12040169
  16. Kalchenko, S., Karman, S., & Arabadzhyiskyi, A. (2021). Management of Regional Development of Green Tourism Facilities. Path of Science, 7(6), 2006-2012. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.71-10
  17. Khalaf, E. E. D. A. H. (2024). Geoheritage and Cultural-Religious Heritage of Samalute-Minia Area in North Egypt. Geoheritage, 16(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00903-z
  18. Lewis, I. D. (2023). Evolution of Geotourism in Australia from Kanawinka Global Geopark and Australian National Landscapes to GeoRegions and Geotrails: A Review and Lessons Learned. Land, 12(6), 1190-1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12061190
  19. Li, Q. J., Ng, Y., & Wu, R. R. (2022). Strategies and problems in geotourism interpretation: A comprehensive literature review of an interdisciplinary Chinese to English translation. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 10(1), 27-46.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.02.001
  20. Li, Q., Wu, R., & Ng, Y. (2022). Developing culturally effective strategies for Chinese to English geotourism translation by corpus-based interdisciplinary translation analysis. Geoheritage, 14(1), 6- 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00616-1
  21. Mastika, I. K., Harsono, S. S., Khristianto, W., Oktawirani, P., & Hutama, P. S. (2023). Creative strategies of local resources in managing geotourism in the Ijen Geopark Bondowoso, East Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(1), 149-168. doi:10.1016/j.ijgeop.2023.01.002
  22. Merella, M., Collareta, A., Casati, S., Di Cencio, A., & Bianucci, G. (2023). Pliocene Geotourism: Innovative Projects for Valorizing the Paleontological Heritage of Three Different-Staged Quarries of Tuscany (Central Italy). Geoheritage, 15(3), 82- 99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00838-5
  23. Munajat, M., Avenzora, R., Darusman, D., & Basuni, S. (2023). Optimization of Edu–tourism through geotourism development strategy in Mount Slamet and Serayu mountainous areas, Central Java Province. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 2805 (1), 12- 35. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0148906
  24. Muslim, D., Zakaria, Z., Rachmat, H., Iqbal, P., Muslim, G. O., Sadewo, M. S., & Muslim, F. N. (2022). Identification of Geodiversity and Geosite Assessment around Geohazard Area of Suoh Aspiring Geopark in West Lampung, Sumatra, Indonesia. Resources, 11(11), 104- 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11110104
  25. Muzambiq, S., Nst, Z. P., & Sabrina, R. (2023). Geotourism as a 16-Geosite Empowerment Strategy-For Tourism Sustainability in Toba Caldera Geopark. Journal of Geographic Information System, 15(2), 294-307. https://doi.org/10.4236/jgis.2023.152015
  26. Nemeth, B., Nemeth, K., Procter, J. N., & Farrelly, T. (2021). Geoheritage conservation: Systematic mapping study for conceptual synthesis. Geoheritage, 13(2), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-021-00561-z
  27. Newsome, D., & Dowling, R. (2018). Geoheritage and geotourism. In Geoheritage(pp. 305-321). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00017-4
  28. Novarlia, I. (2023). A Study of Environmentally-Sound Geotourism Potential in Sumedang Regency. Interdisciplinary Social Studies, 2(5), 1945-1952. https://doi.org/10.55324/iss.v2i5.410
  29. Ólafsdóttir, R. (2019). Geotourism. Geosciences, 9(1), 48- 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences9010048
  30. Quesada-Valverde, M. E., & Quesada-Román, A. (2023). Worldwide trends in methods and resources promoting geoconservation, geotourism, and geoheritage. Geosciences, 13(2), 39- 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences13020039
  31. Reis, J., Póvoas, L., Barriga, F. J. A. S., Lopes, C., Santos, V. F., Ribeiro, B., & Pinto, A. (2014). Science education in a museum: Enhancing Earth Sciences literacy as a way to enhance public awareness of geological heritage. Geoheritage, 6, 217-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0105-0
  32. Ríos, C. A., Amorocho, R., Villarreal, C. A., Mantilla, W., Velandia, F. A., Castellanos, O. M., ... & Briggs, A. (2020). Chicamocha Canyon Geopark project: A novel strategy for the socio-economic development of Santander (Colombia) through geoeducation, geotourism, and geoconservation. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 8(2), 96-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.05.002
  33. Santos, D. S., Mansur, K. L., Seoane, J. C., Mucivuna, V. C., & Reynard, E. (2020). Methodological proposal for the inventory and assessment of geomorphosites: an integrated approach focused on territorial management and geoconservation. Environmental management, 66, 476-497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01324-2
  34. Sanz, J., Zamalloa, T., Maguregi, G., Fernandez, L., & Echevarria, I. (2020). Educational potential assessment of geodiversity sites: a proposal and a case study in the Basque Country (Spain). Geoheritage, 12, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-020-00432-z
  35. Schillo, R. S., Isabelle, D. A., and Shakiba, A. (2017). Linking advanced biofuels policies with stakeholder interests: A method building on Quality Function Deployment. Energy Policy, 100(3), 126-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.09.056
  36. Sen, S., Almusabeh, A., & Abouelresh, M. O. (2023). Geoheritage and Geotourism Potential of Tuwaiq Mountain, Saudi Arabia. Geoheritage, 15(3), 93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00861-6
  37. Spyrou, E., Triantaphyllou, M. V., Tsourou, T., Vassilakis, E., Asimakopoulos, C., Konsolaki, A., & Skentos, A. (2022). Assessment of geological heritage sites and their significance for geotouristic exploitation: The case of Lefkas, Meganisi, Kefalonia and Ithaki Islands, Ionian Sea, Geosciences, 12(2), 55. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences12020055
  38. Tamang, L., Mandal, U. K., Karmakar, M., Banerjee, M., & Ghosh, D. (2023). Geomorphosite evaluation for geotourism development using geosite assessment model (GAM): A study from a Proterozoic terrain in eastern India. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 11(1), 82-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2022.12.001
  39. ues, C., & Braga, V. (2022). Geotourism as promoter of sustainability development: A systematic review and research agenda. Economics and management of geotourism, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89839-7_1
  40. Ulaini, N. (2023). Geotourism Development Strategy in An Effort to Increase the Community's Economy in Nagari Aie Angek, X Koto District, Tanah Datar Regency, West Sumatra. Sumatra Journal of Disaster, Geography and Geography Education, 7(1), 113-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1039/1/012056
  41. Vu, H. D., Nguyen, N. T. P., Ngo, Y. T. H., & Le, T. D. (2022). Geotourism Current State and Future Prospects: A Case Study in the CAO Bang UNESCO Global Geopark, Vietnam. GeoJournal Tour. Geosites, 43, 1063-1070. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.43327-921
  42. Wu, M. Y., Pearce, P. L., (2014). Host tourism aspirations as a point of departure for the sustainable livelihoods approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 22 (3), 440-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2013.839689
  43. Wulung, S. R. P., Putra, R. R., Permadi, R. W. A., & Maulana, M. I. (2020). Concentration-dispersal strategies to assist geotourism destination planning: A case study of Ciletuh-Palabuhanratu UNESCO Global Geopark. Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development Studies, 8(3), 156-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.jitode.2020.008.03.05
  44. Aghaiipour, Y, Ramasht, M H. (2020). Analysis of geotourism literature in Iran (based on the quantitative content analysis of geotourism articles during the years 2017-2018). Quantitative geomorphology research, 9 (1), 42-51. [In Persian]
  45. Arbabi Sabzevari, A. (2014). Evaluation of geotourism capabilities and capabilities in sustainable development (Case Study: Sarab Darband in the city of Sahneh). Natural geography, 7 (26), 65-86 [In Persian]
  46. Aazami, M., Jalilian, S., & Hashemi Amin, N. (2015). Analyzing the Socio-economic and Environmental Effects of Rural Tourism (Case Study: Navareh Village). Journal of Tourism Planning and Development, 4(14), 154-174 [In Persian]
  47. Ghazbani, R., Amin Bidokhti, A A., Jafari, S., Haghighat, H. (2020). Factors affecting the competitiveness of geotourism. Tourism Management Studies, 15 (49), 63-93. https://doi.org/10.22054/tms.2020.11046 [In Persian]  
  48. Ghazi, I., Ghadiri, N. (2011). Geotourism Capabilities of Desert National Park Using the Freeman Strategic Planning Model. Environmental, 37 (60), 65-78. [In Persian]
  49. Hajjeh Foroosh, Sh. (2022). Investigating the Importance of Ecotourism, Agrovakotourism, and Geotourism in the Development of Tourism Industry (Case Study: Semirom County). Geographical studies of mountainous areas. 3 (2), 21-42 [In Persian]
  50. Hejazi, S. A., Heidari, S. A., Rasouli, A., Imanzadeh, T. (2023). Geotourist Evaluation of Protected Areas Using quantitative evaluation methods, Case Study: Mirabad Protected Protected Area (Southwest of West Azerbaijan). Natural Environment Journal, 1 (1), 22-45 Doi: 10.22059/jne.2023.360321.2556 [In Persian]
  51. Imani, B. (2022). Management pattern in geotourism with emphasis on entrepreneurship in rural areas (case: Mahallat city). Regional geography, 20 (2), 167-193.. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2022.51158.0 [In Persian]
  52. Jafari Fard, S., Ghanawati, E., Rezaei, N. (2020). Analysis of the Eshtehard area development strategy based on the capabilities of tourism land inspired by the 2005 Pravong model and SWOT model, Tourism and Sustainable Development Research, 4 (2), 17-30. [In Persian]
  53. Karim, M H., Toulabi nejad, M. (2021). Strategies for Revival of Agriculture In line with the Revitalization of Rural Areas, Rural Economy of Space and Development. 10 (38):17-42. [In Persian]
  54. Karimpour Rihan, M., Nasseri, H R, Danesh, A. (2019). Feasibility of ecotourism and geotourism potential and its impact on the economic capacity of indigenous people of the desert regions (Case Study: South Garmsar region). Journal of Geography (Regional Planning), 9 (35), 81-91. [In Persian]
  55. Mohebati, M., Roosta, H., Weissi, R., Ahmadi, S. (2018). Geotourism Development Strategies: Qeshm Salt Cave. Geography and Urban and Regional Studies, 7 (27), 93-106. [In Persian]
  56. Moradi H, N., Nouri, S H., Khoshnazar, M. (2013). Suitable Strategies for Developing Geotourism of the Soholan Cave. Urban and Regional Studies and Research, 5 (17), 53-68. [In Persian]
  57. Omidzadeh, E, Yari, A, Roshanali, M. (2014). Assessment of capabilities and geomorphic tourist priorities of Lorestan Province. Journal of Urban Ecology Research, 5 (9), 9-28. [In Persian]
  58. Rasouli, A., Wahhabzadeh Kebria, Gh., Mousavi, S. R., Roshan, S H. (2023). Capability evaluation and development of geotourism of Khangar-e-Kuh region using Swot-Anp and QSPM analysis. Watershed Engineering and Management, 15 (2), 242-263. doi: 10.22092/ijwmse.2022.356495.1925 [In Persian]
  59. Rezvani, M. (2008). Rural Tourism Development with Sustainable Tourism Approach, University of Tehran, First Edition, Tehran. [In Persian]
  60. Tahmak, R., Yamani, M., Maghsoudi, M. (2022). the potential of geotourism development in the peripheral areas of arid regions (Case Study: New Ivanki City). Human Geography Research, 54 (2), 753-767. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2021.317726.1008242 [In Persian]
  61. Toulabi Nejjad, M., Monazzam Esmaeilpour, A., Rahmani, S., Sadeghi, Kh, (2022). The effects of tourism on the promotion of the economic and social well-being of rural households in Chabahar city. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 22 (65), 283-301.. http://dx.doi.org/10.52547/jgs.22.65.283 [In Persian]
  62. Wahhabzadeh kebria, Gh. (2022). Geotourism and Geopark is a new strategic strategic management and planning of watershed. Land management, 10 (2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.22092/lmj.2022.125986 [In Persian]
  63. Yarahmadi, D., Sharafi, S, (2016). Ability to be assessing the geotourist facilities and attractions of the Shirz Valley in Lorestan province as geopark. Geographical Journal of Tourism, 6 (21), 19-40. [In Persian]
  64. Zanganeh Asadi, M. A., Saadati Far, R., Gol Mokhtari, L. (2020). Investigating the Effects of Geomorphous Mountains in Tourism Development (Code: Northwest of Neyshabur; Turquoise City). Geographical Studies of mountainous areas.1 (4), 69-87. [In Persian]
Tourism Management Studies
Volume 19, Issue 65
April 2024
Files
Share
How to cite
Statistics