Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Master of Public Administration, Ardakan University, Yazd, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Ardakan University, Ardakan, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Ardakan University, Yazd, Iran.

Abstract

Due to the expansion of the tourism and hotel industry and the role of leadership quality in the promotion and successful development of this industry, several studies have been conducted on this statistical population, considering the specific environmental conditions. Also, recent research has presented a direct, positive, and meaningful relationship between authentic leadership, organizational success, growth, and emergence in the tourism sector. This research aims to investigate the impact of authentic leadership on employees’ thriving at work in the hotel industry, considering the moderating role of organizational politics. A quantitative method (correlation type of structural equation modeling) was used in this regard. The statistical population of the research was hotel employees, and after determining the sample size by G*POWER and distributing questionnaires, 349 complete questionnaires were collected from hotel employees in Shiraz. Initially, reliability and validity were investigated using AMOS software and then the hypotheses were tested using SPSS software and the Process module. The results indicated a positive and significant relationship between authentic leadership and thriving at work, and organizational politics was a significant moderator in that when organizational politics perception was high, the positive effect of authentic leadership on employees’ thriving at work increased. This important finding shows that high organizational politics in organizations adds to the importance of an authentic leader’s positive impact on followers’ thriving at work. 
 Introduction
In the last decade, the discussion of leadership has always been one of the topics of interest to management and organizational behavior thinkers because, in success or failure, the tip of the arrow of attention has been pointed toward them (Amankwaa et al., 2022). One of the influential factors in achieving the success and prosperity of the employees at work and organizational well-being is the correct use of the leadership style appropriate to the existing situation in the organization. In this regard, using an authentic leadership style can bring us closer to this goal. slow down (Surucu, 2022).
Industry leaders in the tourism sector have predicted that the share of GDP in this sector will increase by fifty percent (Warokka et al., 2020). Furthermore, the social growth model presented by Spreitzer et al. (2012) provided a theoretical foundation for examining authentic leadership to achieve success at work. They stated that individual and organizational factors influence success at work, and these two factors will cause success in employees' work by satisfying basic psychological needs. Success at work a psychological state in which a person experiences vitality and learning. (Fang et al., 2021).
The relationship between leadership and an organization's outputs is dependent on its environment. One variable that describes the organization's environment is organizational policy. Organizational politics is a process of social influence in which behavior is strategically designed to maximize personal interests in the short or long term at the expense of the interests of others. (Cho & Yang, 2018).
This research contributes to the knowledge of authentic leadership and work success in several ways. After considering organizational politics moderation, it was shown that the presence of this variable in the organization affects the desired relationship.
Literature Review
In internal studies, research about authentic leadership and its impact on success in work with the role of organizational politics as a moderator has yet to be investigated.
The authors' review of the background of research in foreign studies also showed that there is more diversity in the topics and titles of foreign research than in domestic studies. One reason for this is the long history of recognition of authentic leadership in international studies.
Methodology
Considering that in this research, the researcher seeks to apply the research results and help identify the variable effect of authentic leadership on success at work, this research is of an applied type in terms of its purpose. Also, because the current research deals with the study of what exists according to the research literature and with the help of the background of the conducted research and related books, in terms of the research method, it is a descriptive survey and the research design is quantitative with the correlation method. It is a type of structural equation modeling.
The statistical population included the employees of hotels in Shiraz metropolis (21 hotels), and finally, 349 complete questionnaires were collected according to the sample size determined by G*Power software.
 Results
The present research has investigated the relationship between authentic leadership and success at work, considering the moderating role of organizational politics. In the first hypothesis, the research findings showed a significant positive relationship between authentic leadership and success at work. This means that employees’ success will increase using of an authentic leadership style. This finding is in line with the research results of (2016) Mortier et al. (2019) Wu & Chen and (2021) Iqbal et al. In general, research shows that authentic leaders, due to the transparency they show and show their true selves, incline followers towards them and influence their performance (Wang et al., 2021). An authentic leader directs employees by applying discipline, rules, and rigid procedures. This leadership style influences employees to achieve self-fulfillment at work (Iqbal et al., 2021). In addition, authentic leaders create empathy for their employees by applying the desired style in the organization. This empathy affects employees’ well-being, learning, and strengthening, ultimately leading them to prosperity and success at work (Chang et al., 2021).
In the second hypothesis, the results of the desired hypothesis showed that organizational politics moderate the relationship between authentic leadership and success at work, which means that with the increase of organizational politics, the influence of authentic leadership increases success at work. This result is consistent with the research findings (2020) by Khuwaja et al.
Due to the competitive and ambiguous nature of political contexts, authentic leaders may be less able to motivate and satisfy followers who become distressed, quit, or become disaffected by the political disclosure of behavior by others. They become pessimistic. In addition, authentic leaders’ tendency to speak honestly and listen to different perspectives may expose them to disproportionate efforts toward performance acceptable to followers, undermining their ability to influence follower outcomes. Finally, the transparent nature of authentic leadership can reveal sensitive knowledge and elements from leaders that others can use politically. Therefore, according to the results obtained from the data analysis, the relationship between authentic leadership and success at work changes in the presence of moderating variables such as organizational politics. This means that by increasing organizational politics, the effect of authentic leadership on success at work is strengthened, and employees feel more successful at work.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Amankwaa, A., Susomrith, P., & Seet, P. S. (2022). Innovative behavior among service workers and the importance of leadership: Evidence from an emerging economy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(2), 506–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09853-6
  2. Asad, M., Muhammad, R., Rasheed, N., Chethiyar, Assc. Prof. Dr. S., & Ali, A. (2020). Unveiling Antecedents of Organizational Politics: An Exploratory Study on Science and Technology Universities of Pakistan. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 26, 2057–2066.
  3. Aymoldanovna, A. A., Zhetpisbaeva, B. A., Kozybaevna, K. U., & Kadirovna, S. M. (2015). Leadership Development University Students in the Activities of Student Government. 7th World Conference on Educational Sciences, 197, 2131–2136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.336
  4. Bhattarai, G. (2021). Perception of organizational politics and employee performance: Antidotal role of impression management. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 19(1), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.09
  5. Chang, W., Busser, J., & Liu, A. (2020). Authentic leadership and career satisfaction: The meditating role of thriving and conditional effect of psychological contract fulfillment. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(6), 2117–2136. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2019-0551
  6. Cho, H. , & Yang, J. S. (2018). How perceptions of organizational politics influence self-determined motivation: The mediating role of work mood. Asia Pacific Management Review, 23(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.05.003
  7. Faiz, S., Mubarak, N., Safdar, S., & Khan, J. (2022). A “Curates Egg” Perception of Politics: Why and When Organizational Politics Leads to Good and Bad Outcomes. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 34(4), 627–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21369
  8. Fang, Y. , & Lin, C. L. (2021). Inclusive Leadership and Career Sustainability: Mediating Roles of Supervisor Developmental Feedback and Thriving at Work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 671663. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671663
  9. Ferris, G. R., & Judge, T. A. (1991). Personnel/Human Resources Management: A Political Influence Perspective. Journal of Management, 17(2), 447-488. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700208
  10. Ferris, G. R., III, B. P. E., McAllister, C. P., & Maher, L. P. (2019). Reorganizing Organizational Politics Research: A Review of the Literature and Identification of Future Research Directions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015221
  11. Hochwarter, W. A. (2012). The Positive Side of Organizational Politics. In Politics in Organizations. Routledge.
  12. Ibarra, H. (2015, January 1). The Authenticity Paradox. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2015/01/the-authenticity-paradox
  13. Iqbal, Z. A., Abid, G., Arshad, M., Ashfaq, F., Athar, M. A., & Hassan, Q. (2021). Impact of Authoritative and Laissez-Faire Leadership on Thriving at Work: The Moderating Role of Conscientiousness. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe11030048
  14. Khuwaja, U., Ahmed, K., Abid, G., & Adeel, A. (2020). Leadership and employee attitudes: The mediating role of perception of organizational politics. Cogent Business & Management. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23311975.2020.1720066
  15. Kim, M. R., & Park, J. S. (2020). The Effect of Head Nurses’ Authentic Leadership Perceived by Nurses to Nurses’ Organizational Politics Perception and Organizational Silence. Journal of East-West Nursing Research, 26(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.14370/jewnr.2020.26.1.71
  16. Mortier, A. V., Vlerick, P., & Clays, E. (2016). Authentic leadership and thriving among nurses: The mediating role of empathy. Journal of Nursing Management, 24(3), 357–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12329
  17. Munyon, T. P., Houghton, J. D., Simarasl, N., Dawley, D. D., & Howe, M. (2021). Limits of authenticity: How organizational politics bound the positive effects of authentic leadership on follower satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 51(6), 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12762
  18. Murray, S., & Bosch, A. (2021). Courage and equality—Women doctors’ thriving at work. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 47(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v47i0.1924
  19. Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250–275. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.756
  20. Rowlands, J., Knox, M. W., Campbell, T., Cui, A., & DeJesus, L. (2022). Leadership in Tourism: Authentic Leaders as Facilitators of Sustainable Development in Tasmanian Tourism. In Research Anthology on Business Continuity and Navigating Times of Crisis (pp. 1643–1663). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4503-7.ch079
  21. Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. L., & Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2012.01.009
  22. Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A Socially Embedded Model of Thriving at Work. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0153
  23. SÜRÜCÜ, L. (2022). The Mediating Role of Organizational Commitment in the Effect of Authentic Leadership on Employee Performance. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.870781
  24. Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2007). Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure†. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
  25. Wang, D., Hao, L., Zong, Z., Siu, O., Xiao, Y., Zhao, C., Zhang, X., O’Neill, P., & Hu, Y. (2021). The evaluation of a new multidimensional job insecurity measure in a Chinese context. Stress and Health, 37(1), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2970
  26. Warokka, A., Sjahruddin, H., Sriyanto, S., & Saddhono, E. N. & K. (2020). Digital Marketing Support and Business Development Using Online Marketing Tools: An Experimental Analysis. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(1), 1181–1188.
  27. Wu, C.-M., & Chen, T.-J. (2019). Inspiring prosociality in hotel workplaces: Roles of authentic leadership, collective mindfulness, and collective thriving. Tourism Management Perspectives, 31, 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.04.002