Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of Business Administration, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

2 Professor of Business Management Department, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

3 Associate Professor, Department of Business Administration, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

Abstract

In today's competitive environment the use of intelligence in various aspects of business, including branding, allows organizations to achieve a high competitive position. The purpose of this research was to present the brand intelligence model in tourism start-ups and test the validity of the model. This research was exploratory mixed research. The grounded theory approach was used in the qualitative part. Six university professors and 18 tourism startup brand managers were interviewed through snowball sampling. The statistical population included managers and employees of tourism start-ups in the quantitative part. Finally, 384 questionnaires were collected using a convenience sampling method. A questionnaire based on the Likert scale was used to collect data and structural equation modeling was used to analyze the research data. According to the results, structural factors, management factors, internal content factors and external content factors as causal conditions can influence the intelligence of the tourism brand. Also, economic, socio-cultural, and political awareness as contextual factors and cultural factors, human resources, financial resources, and technological resources as intervening factors have a significant impact on brand intelligence strategies. These strategies include major change, partial change, and no change in the brand. Finally, brand intelligence strategies also have a significant impact on brand intelligence consequences. The results of this research have significantly helped to make the brand management process of organizations intelligent and provide a useful research tool for future studies.
Introduction
In order to get the best results from their brands, organizations should audit their brand capabilities, evaluate external issues affecting their brand, and then create a brand plan that defines the brand's actual goals and the strategy to achieve them. Researchers have developed a new method to analyze brand importance, called the Brand Intelligence Brand Semantic Score program. They have introduced brand intelligence as a method for brand analysis and brand positioning evaluation. However, according to the searches, a model for brand intelligence has yet to be provided. A strong brand is essential for tourism start-ups; it simplifies customers' decisions and creates a competitive advantage. The start-up brand is a very influential incentive in the consumer's purchasing decision when choosing a destination. Therefore, tourism start-ups should strengthen branding concepts and create a positive image in the minds of current and future tourists. To achieve this, brands must continuously manage, enhance and evaluate brand equity and other essential brand metrics. This is possible through "brand intelligence." However, according to the surveys, there needs to be more literature on brand management and intelligence in tourism start-ups, especially in Iran. Therefore, to fill the research gaps, researchers intend to provide a comprehensive model for brand intelligence and identify and test the factors related to brand intelligence with a mixed approach.
Methodology
This research is of mixed exploratory type. The grounded theory approach has been used in the qualitative part, and in the quantitative part, structural equation modeling has been used. In the first stage, a model for brand intelligence was designed, and in the second stage, the validity of the presented model was tested. In the qualitative part, six university professors and 18 marketing and brand managers of tourism start-ups were interviewed using snowball sampling. The statistical population in the quantitative part includes managers and employees of tourism start-ups. The sample size was determined using Cochran's formula of 384 people. A simple cluster sampling method was used for sampling. A questionnaire based on a Likert scale was used to collect data, and structural equation modeling was used to analyze the data.
Discussion and Results
Qualitative data analysis showed that structural factors (existing organizational structure, flexibility of organizational structure, vital role of brand manager in organizational decisions), managerial factors (support and skill of top manager, resistance to change, manager's understanding of the benefits of brand intelligence, up-to-date view of top manager), internal content factors (understanding data and information, understanding the brand and understanding the product), and external content factors (understanding the market, competitors, and tourists) are causal factors that directly affect brand intelligence. Fundamental brand changes (brand name change, brand slogan change, brand promise change, brand identity change), minor brand changes (changing some brand elements, changing some brand management measures, continuing to move toward brand identity), and no change of brand (continuing to move towards brand identity, strengthening brand position by overseeing brand actions and tracking the factors affecting brand) were identified as brand intelligence strategies, According to the results, brand intelligence can have consequences for the brand and, consequently, the whole organization. The consequences of brand intelligence for the brand are brand agility, brand health, brand equity, brand performance, and brand position. Organizational consequences of brand intelligence include organizational agility, organizational performance, satisfaction/loyalty, and sustainable and temporary competitive advantage. In this research, cultural, human, financial, and technological resources are intervening factors. Economic, sociocultural, and political awareness were also identified as contextual factors. According to quantitative findings, structural, managerial, and content factors (causal conditions) can influence brand intelligence. The findings confirmed the effect of brand intelligence, contextual factors, and intervening factors on strategies and the effect of these strategies on the consequences of brand intelligence.
Conclusion
In response to new-age brand management trends, this study aims to increase our understanding of brand intelligence and provide a valid model for brand intelligence of tourism start-ups. The findings of this study pave the way to creating an intelligent brand because in this model, using the grounded theory method, all aspects of making a brand intelligence have been considered and confirmed using SEM. Now, marketing and brand researchers have a comprehensive model of brand intelligence from an organizational point of view, which significantly helps to make the brand management process of intelligence and provides a valuable research tool for future studies. Brand Intelligence is the future of brand management, arming companies with an ongoing diagnostic tool to track and evaluate their brand performance more accurately. In this way, brand managers can first consider a standard for the essential criteria of the brand, monitor the criteria continuously, and make new decisions to take corrective measures if each criterion deviates from its standard value. Intelligence in various aspects of business, including branding, allows organizations to achieve a competitive position in today's turbulent environment

Keywords

  1. Alvares, D. F., & Soares, J. C. (2021). Innovation in tourism and startups in Brazil, Spain and Portugal. Smart Tourism2(2), 10.
  2. Basile, L. J., Carbonara, N., Pellegrino, R., & Panniello, U. (2023). Business intelligence in the healthcare industry: the utilization of a data-driven approach to support clinical decision making. Technovation, 120, 102482.
  3. Brand Koncept. (2022). Brand Intelligence. Retrieved from https://www.brandkoncept.com/solution/brandstrategy/brandintelligence.html.
  4. Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2022). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage.
  5. Camprubí, R., & Gassiot-Melian, A. (2023). Advances in Tourism Image and Branding. Sustainability15(4), 3688.
  6. Chen, Y., & Lin, Z. (2021). Business intelligence capabilities and firm performance: A study in China. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 102232.
  7. Choi, S., & Powers, T. (2023). Timeless principles of social marketing communication: a comparison of the Spanish flu and COVID-19 pandemic communication in South Korea. Journal of Social Marketing13(1), 82-99.
  8. Delucasancillo, A., Del Val Nunez, M. T., & Gavrila, S. G. (2021). Workplace change within the COVID-19 context: a grounded theory approach. Economic Research34(1), 2297-2316.

 

  1. DiPietro, R., Martin, D., & Pratt, T. (2019). Understanding employee longevity in independent fine dining restaurants: A grounded theory approach. International journal of contemporary hospitality management. 31(10), 4062-4085. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-10-2018-0869
  2. Faghat, E. R. B., Khani, N., & Alemtabriz, A. (2020). A paradigmatic model for shared value innovation management in the supply chain: a grounded theory research. International Journal of Innovation Science. 12(1), 142-166.

https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-07-2019-0074

  1. Filieri, R., D’Amico, E., Destefanis, A., Paolucci, E., & Raguseo, E. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI) for tourism: an European-based study on successful AI tourism start-ups, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(11), 4099-4125. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2021-0220
  2. Fronzetti Colladon, A. (2020). Forecasting election results by studying brand importance in online news. International Journal of Forecasting36(2), 414-427.
  3. Fronzetti Colladon, A. (2018). The semantic brand score. Journal of Business Research88, 150 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.026.
  4. Fronzetti Colladon, A., & Grippa, F. (2020). Brand Intelligence Analytics. In A. Przegalinska, F. Grippa, & P. Gloor (Eds.), Digital Transformation of Collaboration. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Collaborative Innovation Networks (pp. 125-141). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  5. Gavilan, D., & Martinez-Navarro, G. (2022). Exploring user’s experience of push notifications: a grounded theory approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal. 25(2), 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1108/QMR-05-2021-0061
  6. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.
  7. Gromark, J., & Melin, F. (2011). The underlying dimensions of brand orientation and its impact on financial performance. Journal of Brand Management, 18(6), 394-410.
  8. Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics1(3), 100027.
  9. Hussein, S. H., Kusairi, S., & Ismail, F. (2022). Modelling the demand for educational tourism: do dynamic effect, university quality and competitor countries play a role?. Journal of Tourism Futures.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-09-2020-0144

  1. Javdani Gandomani, T., & Ziaei Nafchi, M. (2016). Agile transition and adoption human-related challenges and issues: A Grounded Theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior62, 257-266.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.009

  1. Kerdpitak, C., Kerdpitak, N., Pongpeng, T., & Pungnirund, B. (2022). Development of Historical and Cultural Tourism Areas for the Competitive Business of U-don Thani Province. International Journal of Health Sciences, (V), 271-285.
  2. Leso, B. H., Cortimiglia, M. N., & Ghezzi, A. (2022). The contribution of organizational culture, structure, and leadership factors in the digital transformation of SMEs: a mixed-methods approach. Cognition, Technology & Work, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-022-007142
  3. Liu-Lastres, B., Wen, H., & Huang, W. J. (2023). A reflection on the Great Resignation in the hospitality and tourism industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management35(1), 235-249.
  4. Morning Consult. (2022). Brand Intelligence. Retrieved from https://morningconsult.com/product/brand-intelligence
  5. Murphy, C., Klotz, A. C., & Kreiner, G. E. (2017). Blue skies and black boxes: The Promise (and practice) of grounded theory in human resource management research. Human Resource Management Review, 27(2), 291–305.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.006

  1. Naderi, N., Khosravi, E., Azadi, H., Karamian, F., Viira, A. H., & Nadiri, H. (2022). Barriers to developing social entrepreneurship in NGOs: application of grounded theory in Western Iran. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship13(2), 221-243.
  2. Nayal, P., & Pandey, N. (2022). What Makes a Consumer Redeem Digital Coupons? Behavioral Insights from Grounded Theory Approach. Journal of Promotion Management28(3), 205-238.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491.2021.1989541

  1. O’Rourke, A. M., Carrillat, F. A., & Wang, P. Z. (2022). Is brand differentiation necessary for success? The role of purchase goal and confidence in the brand’s position. Journal of Marketing Management38(3-4), 369-397.
  2. Piha, L., Papadas, K., & Davvetas, V. (2021). Brand orientation: Conceptual extension, scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research134, 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.023
  3. Pramani, R., & Iyer, S. V. (2022). Adoption of payments banks: a grounded theory approach. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-021-00133-w

  1. Shaikh, A., & Gandhi, A. (2016). Small retailer’s new product acceptance in emerging market: a grounded theory approach. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 28(3), 547-564.

 https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-06-2015-0087

  1. Sharma, A., Patro, S., & Chaudhry, H. (2021). Brand identity and culture interaction in the Indian context: a grounded approach. Journal of Advances in Management Research. 19(1), 31-54.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-12-2020-0361

  1. Shim, S. I., & Goh, Y. S. (2022). Consumer-Based Product Creativity, Product-Brand Fit, and Product-Category Fit: Which is More Influential in Consumer Responses?. Wacana Seni21.
  2. Siyamiyan Gorji, A., Almeida-García, F., & Mercadé Melé, P. (2023). Analysis of the projected image of tourism destinations on photographs: The case of Iran on Instagram. Anatolia34(2), 144-162.
  3. Skavronskaya, L., Hadinejad, A., & Cotterell, D. (2023). Reversing the threat of artificial intelligence to opportunity: a discussion of ChatGPT in tourism education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism23(2), 253-258.
  4. Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal12(1), 151-168.
  5. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Sage publications.
  6. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2014). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage publications.
  7. Vandendriest, F., Sthanunathan, S., & Weed, K. (2016). Building an insights engine. Harvard Business Review, 94(9), 64–74.
  8. Wang, S., Japutra, A., & Molinillo, S. (2021). Branded premiums in tourism destination promotion. Tourism Review76(5), 1001-1012.
  9. Wei, W., & Ni, H. (2020). Analysis on the operation mechanism of the ecosystem of crowd innovation space based on grounded theory. Journal of Industry-University Collaboration.
  10. Yavari, E., Shafei, R., & Fatemi, A. (2023). Branding for heritages, the ancient tourism leads to improvement of the local economy (evidence from a study in Iran). International Journal of Management Practice16(2), 162-185.
  11. Zhang, J. X., Cheng, J. W., Philbin, S. P., Ballesteros-Perez, P., Skitmore, M., & Wang, G. (2023). Influencing factors of urban innovation and development: a grounded theory analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25(3), 2079-2104.
  12. Aminifar, A., Yavarigohar, F., & Karoubi, M. (2022). Tourism startups in Iran: Success and failure factors. Tourism and Development, 11(3), 315-331[ In Persian]
  13. Anabestani, A., Pourjopari, M., & Khodadadi, A. (2021). An Analysis of Effective Factors in the Formation of Rural Tourism Brand in Kerman. Social Studies Tourism, 9(17), 1-28[ In Persian]
  14. Hajarian, A. (2022). Analysis of Themes Affecting Sustainable Rural Tourism in Rural Areas of Isfahan Province. Tourism Management Studies, 17(59), 115- 151[ In Persian]
  15. Hasani, A., Niroumand, E., & Moosavi Bazargan, J. (2015). A Review of Brand Image in Tourism Destinations and Methods of its Measurement. Tourism and leisure, 3(3), 31-41[ In Persian]
  16. Hashemimehr, A., Norouzi, M., Feizi, S., & Keshizadeh, V. (2022). The relationship between intelligence and technology innovation with the resilience of start-ups in the field of urban tourism during the Corona crisis (Case study of Ardabil province). Innovation Ecosystem, 2(2), 99-113[ In Persian]
  17. Khodabakhsh, F., Ziaee, M., Taghavifard, M., & Torkestani, M. (2022(. A Risk Management Model in Iran's Hotel Industry. Tourism Management Studies, 17(58), 39-71[ In Persian]
  18. Nemati, N., Nemati, D., & Yavarifar, P. (2018). Investigating the fields of activity of startups in the field of health tourism. The first conference of The Role of the Tourism Industry, in particular Health Tourism in Sustainable Employment and Sustainable Development, Karaj[ In Persian]
  19. Varmaghani, M., Ahmadizad, A., & Kafcheh, P. (2017). Implementation of the E-marketing Tools in Tourism industry (Case study: Hotels and travel Agencies in Kurdistan Province). Tourism and Development, 6(10), 45-62 [ In Persian]