Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor of Management, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran

2 Master of Information Technology Management, AlZahra University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Today, virtual reality technologies offer unlimited potential for extensive virtual visits to real tourist destinations. The aim of the research is to measure the impact of the variables affecting the change of attitude in the decision to travel using virtual reality. This research is quantitative research, and in terms of purpose, it is applied, and in terms of data collection, it is a descriptive-survey of correlation type. The statistical population of this research is the users of the tourism channel. According to the Cochran relation, the sample size was 270 people, who answered the questions by distributing the questionnaire online in the statistical community. First, the collected data were analyzed and in the next step, the variables were ranked using the process of fuzzy hierarchy analysis. The research findings indicate that the criteria of flexibility, usefulness, perceived pleasure, a positive and significant relationship with changing attitudes has it. The results obtained in the fuzzy hierarchical method show that the variables of attitude change are first rank, usefulness is second rank, decided to travel is third rank, flexibility is fourth rank, perceived pleasure is fifth rank. It is concluded that tourism service providers should create new models in line with tourism marketing in order to raise the level of virtual experience of tourists.
Introduction
In the development of information and communication technology, the growth of virtual reality technology has attracted attention, especially considering the innovations that are expected from the fifth generation of mobile communications (5G). The fifth generation of mobile communications is an international mobile standard with the aim of commercialization in 2020(Lee et al., 2020). Tavakli and Mora say that despite the move towards virtual tourism, the experiences of tourists in virtual tourism destinations remain relatively unknown. This is especially true if the gender identity and behavior patterns of Iranian women in virtual tourism destinations are mentioned (Tavakoli, Mura, 2015). Zhang and colleagues say that although the studies related to virtual tourism have formed a relatively complete theoretical framework, it is not enough to respond to the systematic and comprehensive attitude of tourists and the causes of the attitude towards virtual tourism (Zhang et al., 2022). It has also been raised in the field of challenges; Although virtual reality provides information about the destination as smart tourism and is very useful, it is slow due to the problems of accepting new technology by tourists (Pestek et al., 2020). Tan and his colleagues have conducted research under the title; Borders are open again! Has virtual reality been friend or foe? Therefore, in this regard and according to the above, the basic research question is what effect does virtual reality have on the attitude and ultimately the intention to travel in terms of external and internal motivations? Previous researches have focused on the role of virtual reality displays in creating a sense of presence and how virtual reality affects destination marketing. To answer this question, a new model in technology development was created in this study. The gap that exists is that in few researches, in terms of investigating the motivation in using virtual reality in tourism, a distinction has been made between internal and external motivations, although Leung et al. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is a parsimony and should be expanded to include factors that are particularly relevant to it (Leong et al., 2020). Therefore, based on the theory of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, in the technology acceptance model, the current research measures the effect of flexibility, usefulness and perceived enjoyment of virtual reality on the change of attitude in the decision to travel. In the current research, an attempt has been made to change the attitude towards virtual reality in tourism. In addition to external motives such as usefulness, criteria such as curiosity, relaxation, and personal belief, which are internal motives, have been investigate.
Material and Method:
This research is quantitative research, and in terms of its purpose, it is applied, and in terms of the method of data collection, it is a descriptive-survey of the correlation type. The method of collecting information is divided into two categories: field (questionnaire tool) and library sources. Library sources have been used to collect theoretical foundations and research literature, and field methods have been used to collect research data. The confirmatory factor analysis test was used to verify the validity of the questions and to specify the key factors of each component, and the structural equation modeling technique was used to check the fit of the research model with the collected data. In the next step, we rank the variables using Fuzzy Hierarchy Analysis Process (FAHP), and make decisions by converting expression variables into triangular fuzzy numbers.
Discussion and results
Three variables of flexibility, usefulness, and pleasure were considered in attitude change, and in attitude change, in addition to measures of external motives, measures of internal motives such as curiosity, relaxation, and personal belief are effective in the decision to travel.
 
 
Conclusions
The findings show that the more the level of usefulness, perceived pleasure and flexibility increases in the virtual space, the more the person's attitude changes accordingly. In the next step, we ranked the confirmed variables using the fuzzy AHP method. Basically, although fuzzy systems describe uncertain and uncertain phenomena, the fuzzy theory itself is a precise theory. The results obtained based on the weighting coefficient show that the attitude change variable ranks first, usefulness ranks second, decision to travel ranks third, flexibility ranks fourth, and perceived pleasure ranks fifth. The findings of the research showed that the flexibility, usefulness, perceived enjoyment of virtual reality by virtual tourism users had an effect on the change of attitude, and this factor leads to their intention to travel.  The result of this will increase the number of tourists in the real environment. Therefore, it is suggested that virtual reality service providers design programs and applications based on this technology to enrich the content of advertising video by adding more dynamic interactive virtual reality elements, creating immersive virtual reality products in order to improve the experience. Increasing the enjoyable experience of virtual tourists affects their behavioral intentions and as a result requests for more information about destinations, the likelihood of visiting the virtual site and then the real trip. The findings showed that in addition to external motives such as usefulness, measures such as curiosity, soothing, and personal belief, which are internal motives, have an effect on the intention to travel

Keywords

Main Subjects

  1. Adachi, R., Cramer, E.M., & Song, H.(2020). Using virtual reality for tourism marketing: A mediating role of self-presence. The Social Science Journal, 59 (4), 657-670. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2020.1727245
  2. Bogicevic, V., Seo, S., Kandampully, J.A., Liu, S.Q., & Rudd, N.A. (2019). Virtual reality presence as a preamble of tourism experience: The role of mental imagery. Tourism Management, 74, 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.02.009
  3. Bell, M.W. (2008). Toward a Definition of “Virtual Worlds. Journal of Virtual Worlds Research, 1(1), 1-5. ISSN: 1941-8477. Doi:https://doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v1i1.283
  4. Chiao, H.M., Chen, Y.L., & Huang, W.H. (2018). Examining the usability of an online virtual tour- guiding platform for cultural tourism education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education, 23, 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2018.05.002
  5. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  6. Garces, S., Pocinho, M., Jesus, S.N., & Rieber, M. S. (2018). Positive psychology and tourism: a systematic literature review. Tourism & Management Studies, 14(3), 41-51 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2018.14304
  7. Giberson, J., & Generation, Y. (2017). Virtual Reality and Tourism. Tourism Travel and Research Association: Advancing Tourism Research Globally,10,1-6. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/tra/2017/Grad_Student_Workshop/10
  8. Guttentag, D.A. (2010). Virtual reality: Applications for tourism, Tourism Management, 31,637-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2009.07.003
  9. Hartig, T.,  Kaiser, F.G., & Bowler, P.A. (2001). Psychological Restoration in Nature as a Positive Motivation for Ecological Behavior. - Environment and Behavior, 33(4), 590-607. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973142
  10. Huang, Y.C., Backman, S., Backman, K.F., & Moore, D.W. (2013). Exploring user acceptance of 3D virtual worlds in travel and tourism marketing. Tourism Management, 36, 490-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.009
  11. Hwang, J., Park, S., & Woo, M. (2018). Understanding user experiences of online travel review websites for hotel booking behaviors: An investigation of a dual motivation theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 23(4), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2018.1444648
  12. Kim,J., Lee, C.K, & Preis, M.W. (2020). The impact of innovation and gratification on authentic experience, subjective wellbeing, and behavioral intention in tourism virtual reality: The moderating role of technology readiness. Telematics and Informatics,1 -55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101349
  13. Kim, M.J., Bonn, M., & Lee, C.K. (2020). The effects of motivation, deterrents, trust, and risk on tourism crowdfunding behavior. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 25(3), 244-260. Doi:10.1080/10941665.2019.1687533
  14. Lee, H., Kim, J.H., & Choi, J.Y. (2018). The adoption of virtual reality devices: The technology acceptance model integrating enjoyment, social interaction, and strength of the social ties. Telematics and Informatics, 39, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.12.006
  15. Li, C., Guo, S., Wang,C.L., & Zhang, J. (2019). Veni, vidi, vici: The impact of social media on virtual acculturation in tourism context. Technological Forecasting & Social Change ,145, 513-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.013
  16. Li, , & Chen, Y. (2019). Will virtual reality be a double-edged sword? Exploring the moderation effects of the expected enjoyment of a destination on travel intention. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 12, 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdmm.2019.02.003
  17. Liu, K. (2013). Happiness and tourism. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(15), 67-70.
  18. Leong, C.M., Tan, K.L., Puah, C.H., & Chong, S.M. (2020). “Predicting mobile network operators users m-payment intention”. European Business Review, 33(1), 104-126. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-102019-0263
  19. Loureiro, S.M.C., Guerreiro, J., & Ali, F. (2020). 20 years of research on virtual reality and augmented reality in tourism context: A text-mining approach. Tourism Management, 77, 104028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104028
  20. Mattila, O., Korhonen, A., Pöyry, E., Hauru, K., Holopainen, J., & Parvinen, P. (2020). Restoration in a Virtual Reality Forest Environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, no. June, 106295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106295
  21. Mendes, J.C., Pereira, L.N., & Guerreiro, M.(2010). MEASURING TOURISTS HAPPINESS: THE CASE OF THE ALGARVE. Sapientia(OALG), 1, 96-114.URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/921
  22. Messinger, P.R., Ge, X., Stroulia, E., Lyons, K., & Smirnov, K. (2008). On the Relationship between My Avatar and Myself Virtual Worlds Research. Consumer Behavior in Virtual Worlds, 1(2), 1-16. doi:https:// doi.org/10.4101/jvwr.v1i2.352
  23. Moon, J., Ke, F., & Sokolikj, Z. (2020). Automatic assessment of cognitive and emotional states in virtual reality-based flexibility training for four adolescents with autism. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51,5, 1-18. doi:10.1111/bjet.13005
  24. Mowafi, M. Y. (2003). Design and evaluation of a flexible framework for collaborative virtual environments, The University of New Mexico. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2003. 3113916,
  25. Nikolaou, A., Schwabe, A., & Boomgaarden, H. (2022). Changing social attitudes with virtual reality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 46(1), 30-61. DOI: 10.1080/23808985.2022.2064324
  26. Park, E., Choi, B. K., & Lee, T. J. (2019). The role and dimensions of authenticity in heritage tourism. Tourism Management, 74, 99-109. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j. tourman.2019.03.001.
  27. Pestek, A., & Sarvan, M. (2020), Virtual reality and modern tourism. Journal of Tourism Futures, 7(2), 245-250. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JTF-01-2020-0004/full/pdf
  28. Rauscher, M., Humpe, A., & Brehm, L. (2020). Virtual Reality in Tourism: Is it ‘Real’ Enough?. Academica Turistica, 13(2), 127-138. https://doi.org/10.26493/ 2335-4194.13.127-138
  29. Rastelli, C.,  Greco, A.,  Kenett, Y.N.,  Finocchiaro, C., & Pisapia, N.D. (2022). Simulated visual hallucinations in virtual reality enhance cognitive flexibility. Scientific Reports, 12, 4027-4041. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08047-w
  30. Sharma, S., Devreaux, P., Scribner, D., Grynovicki, J., & Grazaitis, P. (2017). Megacity: a collaborative virtual reality environment for emergency response, training, and decision making. Electronic Imaging, 70-77. doi:10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2017.1.VDA-390
  31. Subawa, N.S., Widhiasthinia, N.W., Astawa, I. P., Dwiatmadja, C., & Permatasari, N. P. I. (2020). The practices of virtual reality marketing in the tourism sector,a case study of Bali, Indonesia. CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 24(23), 3284-3295. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1870940 
  32. Talafubieke, M., Mai, S., & Xialifuhan, N. (2021). “Evaluation of the virtual economic effect of tourism product emotional marketing based on virtual reality”. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 759268. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759268
  33. Talwar, S.,  Kaur, P.,  Escobar, O., & Lan, S. (2022). Virtual reality tourism to satisfy wanderlust without wandering: An unconventional innovation to promote sustainability. Journal of Business Research, 152, 128- 143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.032Get rights and content
  34. Tan, K.-L., Hii, I.S.H., Zhu, W., Leong, C.-M., & Lin, E.(2022). The borders are reopening! Has virtual reality been a friend or a foe to the tourism industry so far?. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, ahead-of-print No. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2022-0417 
  35. Teisl, M.F., Noblet, C.L., Corey, R.R., & Giudice, N.A. (2018). Seeing clearly in a virtual reality: Tourist reactions to an offshore wind Project, Energy Policy, Elsevier, 122, 601-611. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20193410595
  36. Tom Dieck, D., tom Dieck, M.C., Moorhouse, N., & Jung, T. (2018). Tourists’ Virtual Reality Adoption: An Exploratory Study from Lake District National Park. Leisure Studies, 37 (4). 371- 383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2018.1466905
  37. Tussyadiah, L.P., Wang, D., Jung, T.H., & Dieck, M.C. (2018). Virtual reality, presence, and attitude change: Empirical evidence from Tourism Management, 66, 140-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.12.003 Get rights and content
  38. Tavakoli, R., & Mura, P. (2015), ‘Journeys in Second Life’ e Iranian Muslim women's behavior in virtual tourist destinations. Tourism Management, 46, 398-407. DOI:1016/j.tourman.2014.07.015
  39. Yung, R., Khoo-Lattimor, C., & Potter, L.E. (2021). Virtual reality and tourism marketing: conceptualizing a framework on presence, emotion, and intention, Current Issues Tourism, 24(11), 1505- 1525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1820454
  40. Yoon, S.-Y., Laffey, J., & Oh, H. (2008). Understanding Usability and User Experience of Web-Based 3D Graphics Technology, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(3),288-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310801920516
  41. Zhang, T., McCarthy, Z.,  Owen, J., Lee, D., Chen, X., Goldberg, K., & Abbeel, P. (2018). Deep Imitation Learning for Complex Manipulation Tasks from Virtual Reality Teleoperation.  IEEE   International Conferences, DOI: 1109/ICRA.2018.8461249
  42. Zhang, S.-N., Li, Y.-Q., Ruan, W.-Q., & Liu, C.-H. (2022). Would you enjoy virtual travel? The characteristics and causes of virtual tourists’ sentiment under the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic. Tourism Management, 88, 104429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104429.
  43. Moussavi Neghabi, S.M., Hosseini, S. A., & Moshiri Langroudi, N. (2022). The Effect of Film Nostalgia on Visiting Tourist Attractions (Case Study: "What's The Time in Your World?" Film). Tourism Management Studies, 16(56), 173-209. DOI: 10.22054/tms.2021.61203.2547[ In Persian]