نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه مدیریت دولتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت و کارآفرینی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران

3 دانش‎آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی و تبیین الگوی توسعه گردشگری خلاق روستایی در روستاهای هدف گردشگری استان کرمانشاه انجام شده است. پژوهش از نوع کیفی و مبتنی بر نظریه‌پردازی داده‌بنیاد است. جامعه مورد مطالعه را دهیاران روستاهای هدف گردشگری، مدیران خانه‌های بوم‌گردی، شوراهای روستاها، خبرگان بومی، اساتید دانشگاه در رشته گردشگری و مطلعان کلیدی تشکیل دادند. نمونه‌گیری به‌ روش هدفمند و گلوله برفی انجام شده است. بر این اساس، تعداد 23 مصاحبه با مشارکت‌کنندگان در پژوهش انجام شد و اشباع نظری در مصاحبه 19 حاصل گردید. داده‌ها با استفاده از مصاحبه عمیق نیمه‌ساختارمند گردآوری و با استفاده از راهبرد اشتراوس و کوربین تحلیل شدند. به‌منظور سنجش روایی و رعایت ویژگی‌های کیفی پژوهش، اعتباربخشی داده‌ها حین انجام مصاحبه‌ها از معیارهای چهارگانه لینکُلن و گوبا (قابلیت اعتبار، قابلیت انتقال‌پذیری و تناسب، قابلیت اطمینان و ثبات و قابلیت تصدیق) استفاده شد. پایایی پژوهش با استفاده از فرمول پایایی هولستی (82 درصد) محاسبه گردید. نتایج تحلیل محتوای استقرایی، طی سه رویه کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی به شناسایی تعداد 120 کد اولیه، 32 کد محوری و 6 عامل منتج شد. در نهایت، الگوی گردشگری خلاق روستایی طراحی و ارائه گردید که در آن «گردشگری خلاق روستایی» به‌عنوان پدیده‌محوری متأثر از عوامل علی پژوهش انتخاب شد. عوامل زمینه‌ای و مداخله‌گر به‌همراه پدیده‌محوری راهبردهای توسعه گردشگری خلاق روستایی را شکل دادند و پیامدهایی همچون افزایش سرمایه‌گذاری‌های بخش خصوصی، سوق دادن درآمد از مناطق شهری به روستا، جلوگیری از مهاجرت به شهرها، افزایش نرخ اشتغال، بازگشت به روستا و توسعه فرهنگی و حس همکاری در منطقه شناسایی شدند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Providing a paradigmatic model of creative rural tourism development (case of study: target villages for tourism in Kermanshah province)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ayoub Pazhouhan 1
  • SHahin Behvar 2
  • Hojat alah Maleki 3

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Public Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

2 Ph.D. student of Management and Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Social Sciences, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran

3 Master's student, Department of Business Administration, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

The current research was conducted to design and explain the development model of creative rural tourism in the target villages of Kermanshah province. The research is of a qualitative type and based on database theorizing. The studied community comprised villagers of tourism target villages, managers of ecotourism houses, village councils, local experts, university professors in the field of tourism, and key informants. Sampling has been done using targeted and snowball methods. Based on this, 23 interviews were conducted with the research participants, and theoretical saturation was achieved in 19 interviews. Data were collected using in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed using Strauss and Corbin's strategy. In order to measure the validity and respect the qualitative features of the research, accreditation, and data during the interviews, Lincoln and Goba's four criteria (credibility, transferability, reliability, and verifiability) were used. The reliability of the research was calculated using Holstein's reliability formula (82%). The results of the inductive content analysis identified 120 primary codes, 32 central codes, and six factors during three open, central, and selective coding procedures. Finally, the model of creative rural tourism was designed and presented, in which "creative rural tourism" was selected as the central phenomenon affected by the causal factors of the research. Contextual and intervening factors, together with the central phenomenon, shaped creative rural tourism development strategies and consequences such as increasing private sector investments, driving income from cities to villages, preventing migration to cities, increasing employment rates, returning to villages and cultural development, and a sense of cooperation were identified in the area.
Introduction
Raymond and Richards presented the first definition of creative tourism in 2000. They described it as follows: "A type of tourism that gives visitors the opportunity to develop their creative potential through active participation in the learning and experiences they gain from the characteristics of the destination." The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) defined the concept of creative tourism as follows: Creative tourism is travel that leads to an engaging and authentic experience, with participatory learning in the art, heritage, or special features of a place. It is directed and provides a proper connection with those who live in this place and create this living culture. In Kermanshah province, 14 villages are the target of tourism; for example, we can mention the villages of Kandoleh, Piran, Shalan, Shamshir, Hajij, Khaneqah, and Najobran. Considering the many benefits that the booming tourism industry can bring to the province and the target villages of tourism, it is necessary to pay more attention to the tourism industry in this province, as it can be said that this industry can, in addition to turning the province into the tourism pole can provide one of the axes of all-round development of the province. Therefore, the current research is looking for a way to promote tourism in rural areas to achieve sustainable development by spending less money and using local facilities, and to achieve this goal, creative tourism in rural areas has been investigated. According to the above information and the tourism potential of Kermanshah province, especially the target villages for tourism in this region, they can create conditions that attract domestic and foreign travelers and tourists and provide employment. It will raise the area and ultimately boost the business. Finally, this research seeks to answer the question, what is the pattern of creative tourism in the target villages of Kermanshah province, and what dimensions and components does it consist of?
Materials and Methods
The current research is qualitative in terms of paradigm, developmental-applicative in terms of purpose, and exploratory and ground-theoretical in terms of method. The community of the research studied was comprised of experts in creative tourism. Based on this, 23 semi-structured and in-depth interviews were conducted with key informants using purposeful sampling. The data were analyzed using Strauss and Corbin’s systematic approach. In order to analyze the data, three types of coding are used, which include open coding (creating concepts and categories), axial coding (identifying the core category, causal conditions, contextual and environmental conditions, intervening conditions, strategies, and consequences) and selective coding (creation of theory). In order to measure the validity and comply with the qualitative features of the research, validation, accuracy, and robustness of the data, the four criteria of Lincoln and Goba, such as reliability, transferability and appropriateness, reliability and stability, and verifiability, were used. The reliability of the research was also calculated using Holsti’s coefficient of reliability formula, and 82% was obtained, indicating adequate reliability.
 
Results
The results of coding are summarized in Table 1.      
 Table 1. Components of Creative Rural Tourism Development Paradigm Model




Categorical cluster


Main Categories


Subcategories




A central phenomenon


Development of creative rural tourism


Natural capacities




Attracting tourists




Causal conditions


Communication between policymakers and practitioners


Creating communication circles




Formation of specialized associations




 


Participation of activists and stakeholders




Background conditions


Cultural and social barriers


Cultural differences




Little awareness of the hosts about the needs and wants of tourists




Tourists' lack of awareness of the hosts' culture




Cultural barriers




Intervening conditions


Not using the Internet and virtual space


Limited facilities




Non-use of technology




Absence of presence in virtual space




Competing companies




Lack of suitable conditions




Strategies


Development strategies


Scientific development of tourism




Advertising




Attention to the interests of tourists




Attention to the relative advantages of the region




Development of rural tourism infrastructure




Cultivation




Education




Exhibiting




Consequences


Economic, social and cultural development


Increase in private sector investments




Moving income from urban to rural areas




Prevent migration to cities.




Increase the employment rate.




Return to the village (reverse migration)




Cultural development and a sense of cooperation in the region




Research findings.  
   Conclusions
Based on the research findings, government planners and private companies should consider creative rural tourism due to its role and importance in increasing employment and sustainable rural development. Therefore, in the tourism target villages of Kermanshah province, by creating suitable infrastructures and providing welfare and recreational services for travelers, conditions can be created that attract domestic and foreign travelers and tourists, increase employment in these areas, and ultimately lead to prosperity. Small and medium businesses in the mentioned areas. In this regard, using the basic theory, the current research investigated the influential factors on the development of creative rural tourism.
Summarizing the findings of the qualitative part of the research confirms the fact that by creating communication links between policymakers and the local people of the region, changing the structure of tourism in the region, providing a suitable platform, and identifying tourism capacities in the region and its development in different dimensions (employment, quality of life, preservation of cultural and historical heritage, increase in health level), the ground for creating creative rural tourism in Kermanshah province is provided. However, among these limiting factors are laws and regulations, educational barriers, lack of specialized human resources, organizational and structural barriers, and more Internet and virtual space to advertise and introduce the region to tourists. Strategies and measures that can work in this field include the scientific development of tourism and the use of scientific technology and tools, advertising and introducing the tourist area, creating motivation and paying attention to the interests of tourists, paying attention to the relative advantages of the region, developing rural tourism infrastructure, creating culture, training and holding exhibitions to introduce products. Moreover, the local production of the tourism area, if these measures are realized, the private sector investments will happen in these areas, the result of which is an increase in the employment rate and driving the income to the villages, and a decrease in the migration rate from the village to the city, and an increase Migration is counterproductive and creates cultural development and a sense of cooperation in the region.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Creative tourism
  • tourism development
  • development model
  • tourism target village
  • Kermanshah
  1. اردلان، سعید، زیاری، کرامت­الله، سعیدی‌رضوانی، نوید، حبیبی، کیومرث (1401). الگوی گردشگری خلاق مبتنی بر رویکرد بازآفرینی فرهنگ‌محور با تأکید بر ایده شهر خلاق. گردشگری و توسعه، 11 (1): 35-52. DOI:10.22034/jtd.2021.240128.2087
  2. ایمانی، بهرام، شادمان، رامین (1401). ارزیابی و سنجش عوامل مؤثر در تحقق­پذیری گردشگری خلاق روستایی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای بخش مرکزی شهرستان سرعین). نگرش­های نو در جغرافیای انسانی، 15 (1): 115-130.
  3. بسته­نگار، مهرنوش، حسنی، علی، خاکزاربفرویی، مرتضی (1396). طراحی مدل مفهومی گردشگری خلاق. گردشگری و توسعه، 6 (11): 81-108. DOI:10.22034/jtd.2020.110411
  4. پورجهان، ساره، مهاجر، بشری، کهزادی، سالار (1401). چارچوب نظریه‌ای برنامه‌ریزی گردشگری خلاق: مرور نظام‌مند. برنامه­ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، 11 (41): 103-121.
  5. جهان­تیغ، حسنعلی، عنابستانی، علی­اکبر، میرلطفی، محمودرضا، خوارزمی، امیدعلی (1399). تحلیل پیشران‌های کلیدی اثرگذاری شاخص‌های روستای خلاق بر پایداری سکونتگاه‌های روستایی با رهیافت آینده‌پژوهی (مطالعه موردی: منطقه سیستان). راهبردهای توسعه روستایی، 7 (3)، 323-345.
  6. دانایی­فرد، حسن، اسلامی، آذر (1389). ساخت نظریه بی­تفاوتی سازمانی: کاربرد استراتژی پژوهشی نظریه­ داده­بنیاد در عمل، تهران، انتشارات دانشگاه امام­ صادق، چاپ اول.
  7. رحیمی، راضیه، قنبری، یوسف، برقی، حمید (1399). تأثیر عوامل محیطی- رفتاری بر تحقق گردشگری خلاق در روستاهای هدف گردشگری استان اصفهان. برنامه­ریزی و توسعه گردشگری، 9 (32): 1-18.
  8. سالاری‎پور، علی‌اکبر، علیزاده‎جورکویه، فرنگیس، فریدی‎فشتمی، عالیه، یوسفی‎ماتک، حمیدرضا (1401). شناسایی ظرفیت‌های توسعه کسب‎وکارهای خلاق روستایی از طریق گردشگری کشاورزی (مطالعه موردی: روستای هنده‌خاله). گردشگری و اوقات فراغت، 7 (13)، 36-21.
  9. سلیمانی، زهرا، سجاسی‌قیداری، حمدالله، شایان، حمید، سیفی، سیامک (1402). استخراج تجربیات به­یاد ماندنی گردشگران از مقاصد گردشگری روستایی(مورد مطالعه: شهرستان­های مشهد، نیشابور و طرقبه شاندیز). مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 18 (62): 37-84.  DOI: 10.22054/tms.2023.72990.2812
  10. سلیمانی، سارا، کسانی، صبا، تاج­زاده­نمین، ابوالفضل اردشیر (1402). شناسایی واولویت­بندی عوامل مؤثر برگردشگری خلاق (نمونه موردی: هورامان استان کردستان). گردشگری و توسعه، آماده انتشار.
  11. صادقیان‌بروجنی، نجمه، کیانی‌سلمی، صدیقه، غلامی‌بیمرغ، یونس (1399). شناسایی عوامل اثربخش بر توسعه گردشگری خلاق و تأثیر آن بر پایداری رفتار از دیدگاه گردشگران در مناطق روستایی شهرستان بروجن. پژوهش‌های روستائی، 11 (4)، 696-711.
  12. صادقی، حجت‎الله (1400). تحلیل شاخص‌های گردشگری خلاق در مناطق روستایی (مورد مطالعه: شهرستان دزپارت). روستا و توسعه پایدار فضا، 2 (2)، 68-55.
  13. عینالی، جمشید، محمدی‌یگانه، بهروز، قاسملو، حسن (1398). نقش گردشگری خلاق در توسعه پایدار مناطق روستایی (مطالعه موردی: روستاهای تاریخی- فرهنگی شمال غرب کشور). پژوهش و برنامه­ریزی روستایی، 8 (2): 19-39. DOI: 10.22067/jrrp.v8i2.67441
  14. فخری­پورمحمدی، افسانه، شماعی، علی، پریزادی، طاهر، ساسان­پور، فرزانه (1402). تحلیل تصویر ذهنی گردشگران با تأکید بر گردشگری خلاق (مورد مطالعه: منطقه 12 تهران). گردشگری و توسعه، 12 (1): 325-343.
  15. کاظمی‎زاد، شمس‎اله، روستایی، شهریور، حیدری، رحیم (1402). ارزیابی پیشران‌های حیاتی مؤثر بر گردشگری خلاق با رویکرد ارتقای مؤلفه‌های رقابت‌پذیری شهری (مطالعه موردی: شهر تبریز). فصلنامه جغرافیا و توسعه ناحیهای، آماده انتشار.
  16. محمدی، سعدی، مرادی، اسکندر، رشیدی، زبیده (1396). اثرات گردشگری بر معیشت پایدار خانوارهای روستایی از دید جامعه میزبان (مطالعه موردی: بخش اورامان شهرستان سروآباد). مجله جغرافیا، 15 (52): 121-136.
  17. مسیبیان­ریزی، مهدی، مسیبی، سمانه (1400). تحلیل نقش توسعه گردشگری خلاق شهری در افزایش مشارکت اجتماعی شهروندان. مطالعات مدیریت گردشگری، 16 (55): 319-355.
  18. مصاحبی­پورفرد، مریم، خادم­الحسینی، احمد، صابری، حمید، مختاری‌ملک­آبادی، رضا (1400). شاخص­سازی گردشگری خلاق شهری با رویکرد ایرانی اسلامی (مورد مطالعه: شهر اصفهان). گردشگری و توسعه، 10 (4): 1-17.
  19. Ali, F., Ryu, K., & Hussain, K. (2015). Creative tourists’ experience, memories, satisfaction and behavioural intentions. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing33(1), 85-100.
  20. Bakas, F. E., Duxbury, N., & Vinagre de Castro, T. (2019). Creative tourism: Catalysing artisan entrepreneur networks in rural Portugal. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research25(4), 731-752.
  21. Blapp, M. (2015). Creative Tourism in Bali's Rural Communities Examination of the Current Offer and Advice on Future Product Development(Doctoral dissertation, NHTV Breda University of Applied Sciences).
  22. Blapp, M., & Mitas, O. (2018). Creative tourism in Balinese rural communities. Current Issues in Tourism21(11), 1285-1311.
  23. Blapp, M., & Mitas, O. (2019). The role of authenticity in rural creative tourism. In A research agenda for creative tourism. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  24. Blapp, M., & Mitas, O. (2020). Creative tourism in Balinese rural communities. In Current Issues in Asian Tourism (pp. 219-246). Routledge.
  25. Booyens, I., & Rogerson, C. M. (2015, December). Creative tourism in Cape Town: An innovation perspective. In Urban Forum(Vol. 26, pp. 405-424). Springer Netherlands.
  26. Cao, X., & Yang, Y. (2019). Rural Tourism" New Villagers" Makers under the Guidance of" Homesickness"—Rural Tourism Entrepreneurship Motivation Model based on Grounded Theory. International Conference on Economics, Management and Humanities Science (ECOMHS 2019).
  27. Chang, L., Backman, K., & Huang, Y. (2003). Creative Tourism: A Preliminary Examination of Creative Tourists’ Motivation, Experience, Perceived Value and Their Revisit Intention. Scientific Committee359.
  28. Cloke, P. L. (2007). Creativity and tourism in rural environments. In Tourism, creativity and development (pp. 59-69). Routledge.
  29. Duxbury, N., & Richards, G. (2019). Towards a research agenda for creative tourism: Developments, diversity, and dynamics. A research agenda for creative tourism, 1-14.
  30. Duxbury, N., Bakas, F. E., Vinagre de Castro, T., & Silva, S. (2020). Creative tourism development models towards sustainable and regenerative tourism. Sustainability13(1), 2.
  31. Espriella, R. D., & Restrepo, C. G. (2020). Research methodology and critical reading of studies Grounded theory. Revista colombiana de psiquiatría, 49(2), 126-132.
  32. Gkartzios, M., & Lowe, P. (2019). Revisiting neo-endogenous rural development. In The Routledge companion to rural planning(pp. 159-169). Routledge.
  33. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. MA: Addison-Wesley (content analysis).
  34. Hung, W. L., Lee, Y. J., & Huang, P. H. (2016). Creative experiences, memorability and revisit intention in creative tourism. Current Issues in Tourism19(8), 763-770.
  35. Jelincic, D. A., & Zuvela, A. (2012). Facing the challenge? Creative tourism in Croatia.
  36. Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication.
  37. Maharani, S. N. (2021). Research Paradigm on Grounded Theory Method for Accounting Research: Filtering All Sensory Input. In 7th Regional Accounting Conference (KRA 2020) (pp. 343-352). Atlantis Press.
  38. Mills, J., Francis, K., & Bonner, A. (2008). Getting to know a stranger—rural nurses’ experiences of mentoring: a grounded theory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(4), 599-607.
  39. Mohammadi, A., Moharrer, M., & Babakhanifard, M. S. (2019). The business model and balanced scorecard in creative tourism: the ultimate strategy boosters. Current Issues in Tourism22(17), 2157-2182.
  40. Quezada-Sarmiento, P. A., del Cisne Macas-Romero, J., Roman, C., & Martin, J. C. (2018). A body of knowledge representation model of ecotourism products in southeastern Ecuador. Heliyon4(12), e01063.
  41. Raymond, C. (2007). Creative tourism New Zealand: The practical challenges of developing creative tourism. In G. Richards & J. Wilson (Eds.), Tourism, Creativity and Development (pp. 146-157). London: Routledge.
  42. Remoaldo, P., Serra, J., Marujo, N., Alves, J., Gonçalves, A., Cabeça, S., & Duxbury, N. (2020). Profiling the participants in creative tourism activities: Case studies from small and medium sized cities and rural areas from Continental Portugal. Tourism Management Perspectives36, 100746.
  43. Remoaldo, P., Matos, O., Freitas, I., Gôja, R., Araújo Alves, J., Ribeiro, V., ... & Xavier, C. (2022). An international overview of certified practices in creative tourism in rural and urban territories. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 46(8), 1545-1573.
  44. Richards, G. (2011). Creativity and tourism: The state of the art. Annals of tourism research38(4), 1225-1253.
  45. Richards, G. (2019). Creative tourism: opportunities for smaller places? Tourism & Management Studies15(1SI), 7-10.
  46. Richards, G., & Wilson, J. (Eds.). (2007). Tourism, creativity and development(Vol. 10). London: Routledge.
  47. Roll-Hansen, N. (2009). Why the distinction between basic (theoretical) and applied (practical) research is important in the politics of science (pp. 1750-7960). London school of Economics and Political Science, contingency and dissent in Science project.
  48. Salman, D., & Uygur, D. (2010). Creative tourism and emotional labor: an investigatory model of possible interactions. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research4(3), 186-197.
  49. Short, J. C., Broberg, J. C., Cogliser, C. C., & Brigham, K. H. (2010). Construct validation using computer-aided text analysis (CATA) an illustration using entrepreneurial orientation. Organizational research methods, 13(2), 320-347.
  50. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of grounded theory methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
  51. Souca, M. L. (2020). Revitalizing rural tourism through creative tourism: The role and importance of the local community. Marketing–from Information to Decision Journal, 2(2), 43-50. doi: 10.2478/midj-2019-0009.
  52. Tan, S. K., Kung, S. F., & Luh, D. B. (2013). A model of ‘creative experience’in creative tourism. Annals of tourism research41, 153-174.
  53. Tan, S. K., Luh, D. B., & Kung, S. F. (2014). A taxonomy of creative tourists in creative tourism. Tourism Management42, 248-259.
  54. Teodorescu, N., Stăncioiu, A. F., Răvar, A. S., & Botoș, A. (2015). Creativity and innovation--Sources of competitive advantage in the value chain of tourism enterprises. Theoretical & Applied Economics22(1).
  55. (2006, October). Towards sustainable strategies for creative tourism. In Discussion Report of the Planning Meeting for 2008 International Conference on Creative Tourism(pp. 25-27).
  56. Wattanacharoensil, W., & Sakdiyakorn, M. (2016). The potential of floating markets for creative tourism: A study in Nakhon Pathom Province, Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research21(sup1), S3-S29.